GEICO Files Federal RICO Lawsuit Against 411-Pain & Two South Florida Law Firms
Government Employee Insurance Company-better known as GEICO-has
filed a $15,000,000 lawsuit against Path Medical, the company
that owns the referral service 411-PAIN who is perhaps best known
in Florida for their catchy jingles and questionable
reputation.
The lawsuit filed in the Florida Middle District Court on
November 27 makes far-reaching accusations that seek millions in
damages and could potentially equate to millions more.
What are the allegations in the 411 PAIN
Lawsuit?
Based on the Complaint filed with the Court, GEICO "seeks to
recover more than $15,000,000.00 that the Defendants wrongfully
obtained from GEICO by submitting, and causing to be submitted,
thousands of fraudulent no-fault insurance charges".
GEICO claims that, beginning in 2014 and continuing to this day,
Path Medical cheated them out of millions of dollars by
submitting payments to them for medical procedures that "were
medically unnecessary, illusory, unlawful, and otherwise
unreimbursable…including initial examinations, follow-up
examinations, diagnostic imaging, and physical therapy, and
chiropractic services."
The lawsuit goes on to bring up 411 PAIN's muddy past by
presenting the facts surrounding a 2012 lawsuit in which the
Attorney General's Office sued the referral service for violating
the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, as well as
the Florida law against misleading advertising. 411 PAIN settled
and agreed to paid over half a million dollars in penalties.
After explaining this past case and its resolution, GEICO goes on
to state: "Even so, 411-PAIN did not desist from its fraudulent
and unconscionable conduct."
Additionally, GEICO wants the court to declare illegal $200,000
in current obligations the insurance company has to pay the named
facilities, companies, and persons for PIP bills.
In 2015, the owner of 411-PAIN, Robert Lewin, sought to
consolidate his huge network of chiropractic offices into one
main company, which became Path Medical, LLC. This network relied
on his advertising company called 411-PAIN to funnel clients into
his medical facilities and to law firms that he took payment from
to be part of his service.
Mostly it is this complicated web of questionable actions that
led to this lawsuit.
How does PIP apply to the 411 PAIN Lawsuit?
The insurance payments in question stem from a Florida law known
as Personal Injury Protection(Also known as PIP or No Fault
laws), which affords each driver of a vehicle $10,000 in medical
payments, paid by their own insurance company, regardless of
fault. The system, when used correctly, is an efficient way to
get injured victims swift medical attention without holding up
the courts and patients with long lawsuits.
Florida PIP law allows an injured person to assign their PIP
benefits to health care providers in exchange for medical
services necessary to helping them recovery from their automobile
accident injuries. Once the health care provider has the benfits
assigned to them, they can then submit claims directly to an
insurance company in order to receive payment for the services
they provided.
Of course, in order for these reimbursement payments to be valid,
they must be "legal", as one would expect. Florida law clearly
defines this. Therefore, GEICO is alleging that 411 PAIN violated
many different laws, which in turn makes null and void even
legitimate medical payments since they were paid under illegal
activities.
Which laws did 411 PAIN and other defendants
violate?
GEICO's claim is that the medical centers, lawyer referral
service, attorneys, doctors, and owners knowingly committed
"fraudulent protocols designed solely to financially enrich the
Defendants, rather than to treat or otherwise benefit the
Insureds who purportedly were subjected to them."
In fact, the complaint accuses 411-PAIN and its companions of
violating Florida's Patient Brokering Act, Anti-Kickback Statute,
Self-Referral Act, Clinic Act, and chiropractor advertising
laws.
Path Medical and the Clinic Act
One of the ways in which GEICO claims that 411 PAIN violated the
law is by failing to follow the Clinic Act which, among other
things, requires health care clinics to "appoint a medical
director or clinic director who shall agree in writing to accept
legal responsibility for [certain enumerated] activities on
behalf of the clinic…[and] [c]onduct systematic reviews of clinic
billings to ensure that the billings are not fraudulent or
unlawful. Upon discovery of an unlawful charge, the medical
director or clinic director shall take immediate corrective
action." Additionally, a health care clinic medical director must
""[r]eview any patient referral contracts or agreements executed
by the clinic."
However, GEICO alleges that since appointing a legitimate medical
director to oversee Lewin's slew of chiropractic clinics would
have "impeded" the Lewin's "ability to use the Path Medical
clinics as vehicles to submit a large amount of fraudulent PIP
billing to GEICO and other Florida automobile insurers." In order
to circumvent this hindrance, GEICO alleges that Lewin and Path
Medical appointed puppet medical directors that never even
attempted to fulfill the requirements of the job. Lewin and his
partners and company then appointed David A. Cheesman, D.O. as
their medical director. GEICO claims he accepted the fraudulent
position because "his advanced age, lack of professional
qualifications, professional disciplinary history, and personal
history made it extremely difficult for him to obtain legitimate,
sufficiently-remunerative employment as a physician." Chessman
was placed in charge, as medical director, of five (5) different
chiropractic clinics in the Tampa area. Once can quickly see the
difficulties posed for a 70+ year old doctor to over see all the
referrals, medical billing, and records of five different busy
clinics. GEICO claims that the five clinics Chessman was in
charge of submitted thousands of bills and tens of thousands of
charges to just GEICO alone (much less every other insurer) from
2015 to 2017.
GEICO goes on to detail similar allegations against Ralph G.
Marino, M.D.; Tie Qian, M.D.; and Michael H. Wilensky, M.D.
Alleged Self-referral Act Violations
The Self-referral Act prohibits any health care or medical
providers from referring patients to any entity or service that
they own or have an investment interest in. Violation of this law
would make any medical bills submitted to GEICO through Path
Medical and its affiliates illegal, thus making GEICO not
responsible for the payments. GEICO claims that since Lewin owns
Path Medical LLC, Path Medical Holdings, and 411 PAIN referral
service, he could not legally self-refer patients for medical
services to his own clinics. Likewise, he could not refer clients
to attorneys whom he knew would then refer the patients right
back to his clinics.
GEICO claims that injured parties would call 411 PAIN and then be
either self-referred right to a Path Medical clinic, or would be
referred to an attorney (namely Kanner, Pintaluga, Kanner &
Pintaluga, Landau, and Landau & Associates) who would then
refer their new client to get treated at a Path Medical
clinic.
GEICO provides the court with plenty of examples. One of which
reads: "On March 10, 2017, an Insured named SS was involved in an
automobile accident. SS then called 1-800-411-PAIN, and was
referred - at Lewin and H. Lewin's direction - to Path
Medical-St. Pete. Though the referral violated the Self-Referral
Act, Path Holdings, Path Medical, Lewin, Permaul, and Manion
nonetheless billed GEICO for services they purported to provide
to SS at Path Medical-St. Pete, and then failed to refund the
resulting payments - more than $5,000.00 - on a timely
basis.".
The lawsuit goes on to claim that Path Medical not only provided
clients to Landau & Associates-which was owned not only by
Landau, but also by Kanner and Pintaluga-but also retained them
to pursue PIP billing complaints which generated massive
attorney's fees for the firm.
411 PAIN Lawsuit - Defendants
The defendants named in the complaint are comprised of the main
holding company, its subsidiaries, and its owners, as well as a
few doctors and law firms.
The complaint named Path Medical, 1-800-411-PAIN Referral
Service, and Robert Cash Lewin and a few of his partners.
Additionally, law firms Landau & Associates, P.A., The Law
Offices of Kanner & Pintaluga, P.A., Todd Landau, Howard
Kanner, and Eric Pintaluga were also named. The complaint accuses
them of participating, conspiring, aiding, and abetting their
co-defendants.
Doctors Michael H. Wilensky, M.D.; David A. Cheesman, D.O.; Tie
Qian, M.D.; and Ralph G. Marino, M.D. were also accused by GEICO
of "falsely purport[ing] to serve as the medical directors of
numerous Path Medical clinics, purport[ing] to perform many of
the Fraudulent Services that were billed to GEICO through Path
Medical, and participat[ing] in the submission of fraudulent
billing for the Fraudulent Services through Path Medical to
GEICO."
GEICO claims that they were billed for services that were never
performed and for inflated medical coding that padded bills.
As for motive, GEICO specifically called out the lawyer and
doctor defendants for having poor reputations that required them
to participate in a fraudulent scam in order to secure new
clients. GEICO cited public disciplinary records, sketchy
personal and professional histories, past criminal charges, and
Bar disciplinary actions, all that they claim can be found with a
"quick internet search".
411 PAIN and Robert Lewin's Sketchy
Past
This is not the first time that 411-PAIN or Robert Lewin have
been brought into question. In 2010, Miami New Times wrote a
scathing article on the referral service that basically amounted
to calling them a scam. In 2012, 411-PAIN was forced to settle
with Attorney General Pam Bondi's office over allegations of
alleged misleading ads.
Dolman Law Group is a personal injury firm with offices in
Clearwater, St Petersburg, New Port Richey, and Sarasota. For
more information, visit our website at Dolman Law Group.
Blog:
GEICO Files Federal RICO Lawsuit Against 411-Pain & Two South
Florida Law Firms